Financial Analysis of Sainsbury PLC Essay Example for Free

fiscal Analysis of Sainsbury PLC EssayThis bailiwick leave alone focus upon the fiscal military operation everywhere a two course period of a FTSE ampere-second come with. It will guessk to ascertain how well the follow has performed by scrutinizing lucrativeness, liquidity, efficiency, ge atomic number 18d wheel dimensions and working ceiling. In access to the aforementioned points, it will dwell upon economic factors to discuss the impact they chip in had upon the performance of the business.The FTSE 100 started in the year of 1984 and was compositiond upon the 100 commodiousst companies on the London Stock Exchange, and it is seen as an emblematic index number for the strength of the British deliverance (iforex, trading slit). FTSE 100 companies represent about 81% of the foodstuff jacketisation of the London Stock Exchange (Nationwide Building Society, glossary section). inwardly it lies a substantive contribution to the UK economy and the economic p ower of these smasheds mean they would have a fairly large ripple pith upon the populations economy should thither financial performance reach a state of discontentment.Subject fede balancen and historyThe subject familiarity for this report will be J Sainsbury Plc which was founded in 1869 by keister Sainsbury and his wife, Mary Ann Sainsbury in London (Sainsbury Plc, history section).The arrangement has proven to be one of the UKs close eminent super grocery stores. Some of its remarkable aspects include launching TU clothing in 2004, launching Try Something crude To sidereal daytime in 2005 to promote healthy eating, and becoming the worlds largest fairtrade retail merchant in the year 2010 (it is understand that almost one in every four pounds spent on fairtrade products is at Sainsbury), in 2012 the organization became the proud sponsor to the Paralympic games (this will be diligently examined later in the report to see what effect, if any it has had upon the cal ler-ups revenue) (Sainsbury Plc, history section).In an industry predominantly owned by Tesco (a mart character of 29.9% as of January 2012 gibe to BBC Business News), Sainsbury has had to work hard to stay in competition. Its persistency has been a key component to its contrivance in the industry and early(a) hypothesiss to which Sainsbury has embarked upon, namely, its banking venture (a 50/50 venture with Lloyds TSB) which commenced trading on the 19th day of February 1997 (Sainsbury slang plc).The mansion lost its position as market leader in the year of 1995 to its rival Tesco and subsequently dropped to third in market share by and by ASDA experienced a 5% rise in loot (BBC, Business News section). As at March 31 2012, Sainsburys has a total number of 440 convenience stores and 572 supermarkets which is currently overdue to change magnitude (Sainsbury, Store Portfolio section). The question is, how ofttimes has its involutionary policy suffered its profits whilst maintaining equilibrium with costs?ProfitabilityWithin this report, diligent focus will be shown to the financial year of 2010 and the final year of 2011 as the positivity, liquidity, efficiency, gearing balances and working chief city is examined. The profit from disposal of properties in 2010 was 27m and 108m in 2011 which shows a dramatic appreciation in profit when compared. Moreover, the guild likewise showed an change magnitude in combined profit from 585m in 2010 to 640m in 2011 (Sainsbury, Income rehearsal 2011 section). This shows that the companys overall performance has improved over the course of 12 months by 9.4%. more thanover to the aforesaid points, the greater percentage of revenue was get alongd from the sale of products and services, standing in at 22,943m in 2011 (Sainsbury, Income contention 2011 section). This shows an plus in product purchases and an increase in market share (an increase of 16.1%, Telegraph, September 2011) leadership to more gross revenue, demonstrating that the firms schema has worked for the financial year when compared to the sales of 2010 of 21,421m (Sainsbury, Income Statement 2010 section).Return on Capital Employed can be defined as follows Return on capital employed is a bloodamental measure of business performance as it compares the operating profit with the total capital used to generate that profit. (Black, 2009, p.212). For Sainsbury, this figure was 11% in the financial year of 2010 and 11.1% in the year of 2011 (Sainsbury, yearly answer for 2011 section). Such a minor change doesnt manifest a huge ground level of progress. In the annual report for 2011 p4, the company does appoint an account for this and state that festering was lower than the antecedent year due to the cumulative effect of its accelerated deckment in seat growth which started June 2009.The company alike holds seventh place for volume market share in the clothing industry and instanter has clothing sales development faster than food, 17% to be exact with year on-year growth (Sainsbury, annual wrap up 2011 section). Celebrity fashion word-painting, Gok Wan has been a huge support in inciting growth of the TU puzzle out by launching a clothing range at Sainsbury in 2011 which has been the main source of sales boost. (gok wan, Sainsbury TU section).In addition to the appreciation of sales, the cost of sales rose from 19,964m in 2010 to 21,102m in 2011. Prominent add factors towards the rise in costs are the variation in Fiscal policy (Sainsburys, Directors report 2011 section) which increase the rate of VAT from 17.5% to 20% on the 4th day of January 2011 (HM Revenue and Customs, 2011) along with the increase of the companys workforce due to its addition of 1.5 million square feet of space from 2011-2012 (The Independent, word section).As the profitability of the organization is scrutinized, it is important tolook deeper into what has resulted in an increase in profit from the year 2010 to 2011. From an economic perspective, the Bank of Englands Monetary Policy Committee (hereinafter referred to as MPC) changed the discount rate to 0.5% on the 5th day of March 2009, positively influencing public spending and reducing the cost of borrowing (Bank of England, 2009). The concept upon the reduction in the cost of borrowing is that more customers have resorted to using credit to fund their purchases (According to a study conducted by Visa Vanquis, consumer spending on credit increased by 3% in September 2011 when compared with statistics for 2010).It is unsounded that the variation eluded to above has been of support to the company in its financial borrowing, enabling it to fund its expansion referred to in the above dissever. The downside is that it has had a fundamental impact upon its banking venture namely, profits attained are not what they could be if the discount rate was higher, notwithstanding the fact that, the bank reported a 9% increase in profits in 2011 (T his is money, news section) possibly due to the abovestated research on consumer spending. A higher base rate would mean higher priced loans leading to greater profits accrued (other factors being equal).Taking into devotion the above-mentioned point, the company had the opportunity to utilize the reduced interest rate in support of its expansion and other purchases to aid the loss of profit (due to low interest rates) from the sales of loans and credit cards. In rebuke of the 0.5% base rate set by the MPC, Sainsburys Chief Executive stated it was the wrong stopping point to reduce it, the small businesses that supply Sainsbury were struggling to borrow and this of course had a substantial ripple effect upon the companys financial performance (Daily Telegraph, news section). This gives a throw indication that the profit put in for 2011 could of been higher without the economic discontentment. It gives some direction to why the cost of sales were high due to the acquire price o f products from smaller businesses to which supply Sainsbury.Having analyzed the profitability of Sainsbury, its within good reason to compare this selective information with that of its main competition, namely, Tesco for which happens to be a pivotal comparison due to them standing within similar suit in terms of business models and future company goals. Tesco UK gained 56,910m in sales for the financial year 2010 and maxim an increase for year 2011 with sales in at 60,931m (Tesco, yearbook Report 2011 section). There is a substantial difference in sales, however Tesco have 3,054 UK stores in comparison to Sainsburys combined 1,012 stores, in addition it has the greater market share (Tesco, storefinder section).Tescos Return on Capital Employed for 2010 stood at 12.1% and 12.9% for the financial year 2011 (Tesco, Annual Report 2011 section) and according to the directors report the company has set itself a target to evolution this to 14.6% by 2014/15. This, together with its sales exhibits better performance than that of Sainsbury and epitomizes the comprehension to why the company holds the greatest share of the market. It shows clarity that Tesco did better with capital than that of Sainsbury, however Sainsbury used a large amount on expansion which the results of will be shown at a later date.LiquidityWith liquidity being the second focal point, it is necessary to look at the credit facilities available to the organization in question. Sainsbury has overall debt and credit facilities of 3 billion at its disposal, the principle element of Sainsburys core financing comprises of two semipermanent loans of 1,069m due 2018 and 840m due 2031, secured over property assets (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011). Further to the previous stated loans, the company has unsecured debt of 180m and 50m due between 2012 and 2015 along with 190m of convertible bonds due July 2014 (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011).The Current proportionality for Sainsbury in the financial yea r of 2010 was 0.64 and 0.58 in the financial year 2011. A Current Ratio may be defined as a measure of an organizations ability to pay its shortterm debts, ideally it should stand in at 21 (Atrill McAllen, 2008). The ratio for 2010 indicates that the company would be in a better position at paying off its obligations if they were due at that point in time. even due to the ratio for some(prenominal) years being under 1, it shows the company is not in a good position. ironically however, having ascertained the available credit to the organization, this states otherwise.In comparison to its competition, Tesco had a current ratio of 0.73 in the financial year 2010 and 0.65 in the financial year 2011. This is somewhat similar with Sainsbury as there is merely a gap of .2 in difference. Both companies figures look worrying, however the ability to turn source into cash is another focal point to which will be later scrutinized.Having revisited the companys eternal rest sheet, its Net debt stood at 1,549m in 2010 and 1,814m in 2011 (an increase of 265m). This difference quintessentially indicates that the company has been expanding over the course of a year. In the firms annual report for 2011 it shows the increment was due to rapid estate development (the addition of new Sainsbury Convenience stores) which was to an incontrovertible extent funded by the sale of leasebacks and advanced working capital (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p5).The appreciation in debt manifests the fact that Sainsbury hanst cleared its existing debt, yet only continued to borrow more. Astonishingly however, the amount borrowed has been put to positive use in funding the expansion of the organizations convenience stores. According to the Independent in March earlier this year, the company grew its market share of the convenience store market in 2011 with sales up 20% following the col of 15 new stores.Further to the above-mentioned points, the company pursued further borrowing to enhanc e its profitability by expanding (proven to be a remunerative venture), enabling the firm to pay back its source of funding when required to do so. The idea of this long-term investment is that Sainsbury will gain a larger market share (forcing other little competitive companies to abdicate there share of the market) and increased profits both short and long-term.In criticism of the technique, the company should take into consideration the unforeseen changes in the market, namely guide for its products and services and of course future economic changes. How does it justify itself financially should there be a drop in inquire? The epitome lies with XL Airways, according to BBC News in 2008, the company hit financial discontentment after failing to secure further funding (up until that point it was in the process of expanding) due to unanticipated changes in the economy.EfficiencyWith regard to the organizations efficiency, it is difficult to ascertain the overall enduringness of performance without conducting in-depth research as it can be fairly arduous to gather enough data from ratio analysis. However, the businesss average inventory disturbance (calculated by sales divided by inventories, Agyei-Boapeah, 2012) for the financial year 2010 was 30.5 (Sainsburys Income Statement 2010, p16), compared with 28.2 for the financial year 2011 (Sainsburys Income Statement 2011, p18) shows a tokenish difference.The figures imply a poorer performance from the company in 2011, yet sales had subsequently increased in that year, furthermore, it was part of the organizations goals to increment the sale of non food products which gives an account for the less frequent switching of inventories (Sainsburys Income Statement 2011, p2 Sainsburys Annual Report 2011, notes 16).In assure to gain a greater interpretation of the companys efficiency its necessary to look at other ratios. Asset turnover (calculated by revenue divided by total assets, Agyei-Boapeah, 2012) for the financial year 2010 was 1.83 and 1.85 for the financial year 2011 (Sainsbury assort Income Statement 2011, p1). The higher the figure, the better. Having scrutinized these figures, it is clear to see a frail inclination in sales generated from assets for 2011. Although, the company has only seen a small contribution of profit accrued from the sale of assets. This may be understood by reviewing the firms growth policy once again and recalling that they have spent more on expanding and accumulating assets than selling assets (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p5).A comprehension of the above-mentioned points give clarity that the companys management have conducted there duties efficiently. The prominence lies within sales performance and the ever growing multitude of stores to which the firm has within its ownership. The increased space exhibits a positive rate of expansion (15.9% according to Sainsbury Income Statement 2011, p2), furthermore, only a small percentage in change on the sa le of assets and alower inventory replacement.Further to the aforesaid point referring to replacement of inventories, it could be interpreted that as the firm sees a continuity of expansion, more goods are purchased through economies of scale (greater coatd orders at lower prices, import less reordering) as is it the case that the company is introducing further non food products, namely televisions which arent everyday purchases. further of course it is likely to be the last mentioned having previously identified company intentions (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p2). ultimately it is prudent to take the ratios and compare them with that of Tesco. In the financial year of 2010, 20.8 was Tescos inventory turnover ratio and 19.2 in the financial year of 2011 (Tesco Annual Report 2011, p94). Again these figures represent an even poorer performance, but Tesco as do Sainsbury, sell a number of non food-products, 22% of sales are non-food products and the company is the UKs largest non -food retailer (Tescopoly.org, Our Business section).Asset turnover for Tesco in the financial year of 2010 was 1.56 and 3.18 for the financial year 2011 (Tesco Annual Report 2011, p106). This shows some disparity in business efficiency and shows the company performed better in the year of 2011 when compared with 2010 and it also performed much better than Sainsbury (however it is mandatory to consider the companys goals in comparison to that of Sainsbury).Asset disturbance comparison of Sainsbury with Tesco.Gearing RatiosThe gearing ratios (Long-term liabilities) for Sainsbury on the 20th day of March 2010 were 32.86 compared with 30.79 on the 19th day of March 2011 (Telegraph shares, p1). This implies the companys rate of borrowing to fund its activities was higher in the year of 2010 and as a result of the increase in profit for 2011 as eluded to above, activities were self-funded more often.The ratios referred to in the above paragraph doesnt have the greatest of difference, me aning there was still a substantial amount funded by borrowed funds in 2011. A contribution to the high rate of borrowing is carefully examined by look at the Office of National Statistics for 2010 and 2011.According to the Office of National Statistics, Consumer Price Index (hereinafter referred to as CPI) in the 12 months up to September 2010 saw a 5.2% increase in alcohol and tobacco products, a 5.1% increase in food and non-alcoholic beverages, 4.4% increase in communication and a 2.5% increase in other goods and services, including give notice (Office of National Statistics 2010/2011 Report, p1). Such increases may have caused customers to abstain from certain purchases or make less frequent purchases, this as a ripple effect would significantly impact upon the organizations functioning.Ironically however, in 2011 CPI was at 5.2% in September, compared with 3.1% in September 2010 (Office of National Statistics 2011 Report, p1). A significant increase would anticipant further borrowing, yet this isnt the case due to above-mentioned facts in this report. Sainsburys strategy to invest in expanding has given support to its profits for 2011 and enabled the business to reinvest these into its activities. This therefore negates the argument/concern over economic impact upon trading for 2011 and shows a return on investment when compared to company sales and profits with an amalgamated comparison of 2010/2011 financial performance (Sainsbury Income Statement 2011, p1-p5).Working Capital ManagementMoving on to the final focal point in this report, working capital. This is the measure of both a companys efficiency and its short-term financial health (Agyei-bopeah, 2012). The working capital of the organization has seen a substantial increase in the financial year of 2011. The firms working capital increased by 78m for 2011, which it states was in general due to increased inventories which is 110m higher than that at March 20th 2010 (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p1).An examination of ratios will help to ascertain the effectiveness of the firms working capital management, however it appeared difficult to derive this information from Tesco due to discrepancies to way in which data was laid out. Working Capital to Sales ratio can be calculated by taking working capital and dividing it by sales X 100 (Agyei-Bopeah, 2012). In the financial year of 2010 this figure was 1.5.7 and 1.2.8 for 2011. This manifests a less appreciated rate of performance for the year 2011, however the company did introduce a substantial number of non-food products.The company successfully managed to make cost savings of 50m in the year 2011 (Sainsbury Interim Results 2011, p1). In an argument against this successful business practice, is it estimable for the company to pay farmers the minimal amount per gallon of milk to keep its customer wants satisfied? Herein lies a problematic issue to which the organization faces in its ever growing liking to reduce costs. As a result it has led to pragmatism in critics of the firms fairtrade leaf blade image and to what extent it coincides with the image.British farmers are forced to pay the price of supermarket price wars (The guardian, Saturday 2 July 2011, p48). With much(prenominal) concern over how much the firm should be saving on costs to attain a better position with working capital, it fails to take into consideration its ethos on fairtrade. It transpires to be the case that in order to make huge savings to support its growth in working capital, the company must continuously force its suppliers to drive the price of their products down as other factors change (cost of production, economic variations, energy/fuel prices and the cost of raw materials).On a more positive note, the company has managed to increase its working capital from the financial year of 2010 to 2011, this indicates positive changes in its business activity and demonstrates that it has good working capital management. As a re sult of the increase, 12m in debt was paid off in the year of 2011. Yet as this section happens to coincide with efficiency, it epitomizes the effectiveness of the company strategy for 2011.ConclusionSainsbury has set itself a fair number of targets to which are laid out in the company annual report for 2011. One being to increase space growth of 15% in two years set in the year of 2009 (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p1).The company exceeded this target percentage by .9% (Sainsbury Annual Report 2011, p1) which indicates its able to meet its targets, yet it also indicates more capital was spent on expanding and possibly more than it intended.As eluded to in the above sections, Sainsburys decision to rapidly expand has proven to be a remunerative venture and shown a slight increase in company profits for short-term comparisons between the financial years 2010 and 2011 where sales have grown by 9.4% (Sainsburys Income Statement 2011, p1). Such developments in the business will only gi ve adequate comparisons after a greater interval enabling the researcher to comprehend as to how much the accelerated growth has had on the firm.In addition to the companys growth in size it saw a huge appreciation in demand for its clothing punctuate, TU. It is understood that since fashion icon Gok Wan introduced a range of clothing, sales saw a growth of 17% as a year on year comparison for 2011 (Sainsburys Media, Latest Stories, p1). It is likely that this will continue to grow and complement the companys expansion.Further to the above points, the liquidity ratios of the company are poor at this point in time which is due to accelerated growth (therefore negates the argument of poor performance). However when the firm finishes its expansion it is highly likely that the ratio will improve which is subject to no further large projects. Further to information ascertained from the company Annual Report of 2011, the company should be capable of repaying its loans as of there due dat es thanks to its increased number of stores accumulating further profit.In addition to aforementioned points in the beginning of the conclusion, Sainsburys have five focus areas, great food at fair prices, accelerating the growth of complementary non-food ranges and services, attain more customers through additional channels and growing supermarket space (Sainsburys Annual Report 2011, p3). Having already acknowledged the prosperity of its space growth, this also happens to coincide with its focus on reaching customers through additional channels as 37 new convenience stores were opened in the latter part of 2010 to the beginning of 2011 (Sainsburys Media, Latest Stores section).Since analyzing the company gearing ratios and how much it has in long-term debts, it is clear to see it could be a perilous problem for Sainsbury. The firm has made an audacious decision to invest in expanding in the hope for substantial returns in the not to distant future, yet this is not guaranteed inco me. If demand falls for the companys products and services or there is a problem to which later impacts upon its brand image (the company is disproved to be a fairtrade retailer for example) the firm may find itself being liquidated if it is uneffective to repay the loans.Points eluded to in the above paragraph are a matter of deep concern to the organization and from research administered it doesnt transpire to be the case that the firm has a contingency plan to support them with potential depreciation in demand. A contingency plan and in addition, a contingency fund is something to which Sainsbury should take into the highest of consideration should one not have already been devised (yet it is unlikely this would be the case). It will be of support to the firm in planning for unforeseen changes.ReferencesIn this report the following sources were dwelled upon for guidance in ascertaining facts, extracting data and for the purpose of comparison.BooksAtrill, P., McAllen, E. (2008) A ccounting and Finance For Non-Specialists. Sixth edition. Prentice Hall. Harlow.Datta, S. (2011) Economics, Making sense of the modern economy. ordinal edition. Profile Books. London N, Gregory Mankiw. (2001) Principles of Economics. Second Edition. Harcourt College Publishers.ImagesJames Blake (2012) Sainsbury Supermarket. image online obtainable at http// www.jbiwebdesign.co.uk/website-marketing/7-marketing-tips-we-can-learn-from-sainsburys Accessed 12 December 2012.Lecture NotesAgyei-Boapeah, H (2012). Financial Statement Analysis 2. Lecture notes distributed in the topic BMAIE001AZ2012/3 Managing Finance. Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool on 02 November 2012. Agyei-Boapeah, H (2012). Working Capital Management 1. Lecture notes distributed in the topic BMAIE001AZ2012/3 Managing Finance. Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool on 09 November 2012. Agyei-Boapeah, H (2012). Working Capital Management 2. Lecture notes distributed in the topic BMAIE001AZ2012/3 Managing Finance. Live rpool Hope University, Liverpool on 16 November 2012.WebsitesBBC News (2004) Sainsbury Loses Out To Rivals. ONLINE Available at http//news.bbc.co.uk/1/ hi/business/3682544.stm Accessed 24 October 2012.BBC News (2012) Tesco trade Share Dips Below 30%. ONLINE Available at http// www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16817254 Accessed 18 October 2012. BBC News (2008) Thousands Stranded By XL Collapse. ONLINE Available at http// news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7611639.stm Accessed 21 October 2012. Bank Of England (2009) Statistical Interactive Database prescribed Bank Rate History. ONLINE Available at http//www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/iadb/Repo.asp Accessed 19 October2012.Guardian (2011) British Farmers Forced To Pay The live Of Supermarket Price Wars. ONLINE Available at http//www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jul/02/british-farmers-supermarketprice-wars Accessed 23 October 2012. Gokwan (2011) Sainsbury Collection Press . ONLINE Available at http//www.gokwan.com/ goks-video-blog/sainsbury-collecti on-press-launch/ Accessed 23 October 2012. iforex (2012) FTSE 100. ONLINE Available at http//www.iforex.com/ftse-100 Accessed 18 October 2012.Independent (2012) Small Store Openings Boost Sainsburys Profits. ONLINE Available at http// www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/small-store-openings-boost-sainsburysprofits-7579664.html Accessed 20 October 2012. J Sainsbury (2012) About Us, Store Portfolio. ONLINE Available at http//www.jsainsbury.co.uk/about-us/store-portfolio/ Accessed 25 October 2012. J Sainsbury (2011) Annual Report 2011. ONLINE Available at http//annualreport2011.jsainsbury.co.uk/downloads/pdf/sainsburys_ar11_note_26_notes_to_the_cash_flow_statements.pdf Accessed 18 October 2012.J Sainsbury (2011) Financial Statements, Annual Report, Balance Sheet. ONLINE Available at http//annualreport2011.j-sainsbury.co.uk/financialstatements/balancesheets.shtml Accessed 18 October 2012.J Sainsbury (2011) Financial Statements, Annual Report, Cashflow. ONLINE Available at http// an nualreport2011.j-sainsbury.co.uk/financialstatements/cashflow.shtml Accessed 18 October 2012.J Sainsbury (2011) Financial Statements, Financial Review. ONLINE Available